Grant Focus 2012 Design:
Speculate: Postulate: Question: Research: Theorize: Explore
In their submissions,
members of the profession are encouraged to push beyond the boundaries of
everyday practice. The Grants Committee
jury is open to submissions exploring new design theories, speculations about
new landscape interventions, questioning the current norms of practice, and
arguing for new areas of research and professional development, as well as
submissions seeking to expand the traditional areas of landscape research.
Proposed research may be in
the form of designs, articles, papers, and essays. In all instances the successful proponents
are encouraged to promote the wide dissemination of their design-research
results in the larger public realm as well as within the profession.
The jury recognizes that
the sums awarded by the Foundation are, at best, “seed monies” to instigate
further design-research investigation.
Preference will be given to those submissions that look beyond the
immediate requirements and results of this award. Members of the profession are
encouraged to take this opportunity to push the boundaries of inquiry, take
some risks, and to enjoy the beginnings of a longer- term journey!
2012 Funding
For
2012, grants up to $10,000 are available to AAPC/CSLA professionals, educators
or others seeking to explore or question an issue or particular interest they
believe to be crucial to the profession or to the landscape.
In
addition, two grants of $2,000 each are offered to graduate students pursuing
their thesis or final project for work whose study focus is in keeping with the
mandate of the Foundation.
Applicants may apply for additional funding in subsequent years.
Timeline
Fall 2011 Announcement
of 2012 Grants Program.
November 18, 2011 Grant
applications due
January 2012 Announce recipients
and release of 50% of funds.
Winter/Spring 2012 Announcement
of award winners in CSLA Bulletin.
December 18, 2012 Finished
product submitted, final funds released.
Eligibility
LACF grant applications will
be accepted from landscape architects, students, educators and others. Members of the LACF Board of Directors, the
LACF Grants Committee, its jury and their relatives are not eligible for
grants.
Promotion and Communication of Projects
As
a condition of award, all recipients are strongly encouraged to publish,
present or appropriately communicate the results of their work to CSLA members,
the public or other audiences. It is
understood that grant recipients must allow LACF to use the end-product for
purposes of promotion and visibility of LACF and to distribute results of
funded projects upon requests from others. As well, successful applicants must agree
to suitably acknowledge LACF as project sponsors.
Submission
Guidelines for 2012
Applicants are required to
provide the following information in their submissions. Applications submitted
without satisfying all these requirements will not be considered.
1. Concise statement of the proposed project, not to exceed 250 words.
- A description of the project, not to exceed 5 pages, to include
statements of: intent or purpose,
methodology, significance of the project, potential usefulness or application
of the results, means by which results will be communicated to others,
qualifications of proponents to undertake the work and indications of support
for the project from communities, users or clients. Include sufficient information to clearly demonstrate how the proposed
project meets the evaluation criteria stated below.
- A timetable for undertaking and completing the project.
- A detailed budget indicating how requested funds will be spent.
- Information on other sources of funding already supporting the project
or sources from which additional funding will be sought. Particular attention will be given to this point.
- A clear statement of the
end-product to be produced and how or where publication, presentation or
communication of results will be achieved.
- A resume of the prime applicant (no more than 5 pages) and project
associates and a profile of the team organization, if relevant.
- At least one letter of support for the proposed project, preferably
from a community group, client or user.
- Submissions must be sent in one pdf file and receipt confirmed by the
Chair of the Grants programme.
10. Submissions must be received no later than Friday, November 18, 2011.
Send submissions to: fayepaul@mnsi.net
Evaluation by the Grants Jury
The Board of Directors of LACF has established the following evaluation criteria. Members of the LACF Grants Jury will evaluate
the submissions based on these criteria.
The decisions of the jury are final.
The Jury reserves the right not to make any awards.
- Projects shall fit within the established philosophical framework,
objectives and activities of LACF.
- Projects shall be capable of being delivered in a form usable by LACF
for promotion, visibility and fund-raising purposes.
- Projects shall be achievable within the timeline established by the
LACF Board.
- Proponents' qualifications shall indicate capability to undertake the
project.
- Letter(s) from communities, clients, users or other relevant parties
shall indicate support for the project.
- The overall quality of the proposal shall merit funding support.
Property Rights
All documents
submitted are the property of the LACF and will not be returned. The LACF
assumes no responsibility towards participants for the loss, disappearance or
destruction of documents in their application(s), nor for documents submitted
late.
Design: Speculate: Postulate: Question: Research: Theorize: Explore
“Everyone designs
who devises courses of action aimed at changing existing situations into
preferred ones.“
Herbert Simon, 1969 in “The Science of Design: Creating the
Artificial”
“Professionalism
depends on a body of knowledge about what ought to be. This is not just to do with the market; this
is not knowledge in the academic sense.
This is about the application of moral obligation in the context of
action. Future-seeking
knowledge is what the
professional bodies of medicine, law and architecture (landscape architecture)
are really all about.”
Francis Duffey, 1996 in Mitchell, “New Thinking in Design”